Choose FP Markets if you want…
Australian + EU traders wanting deep equity CFD coverage via IRESS plus ECN FX execution from a dual-tier-1 broker.
We compared FP Markets and OANDA across five core criteria: regulation, minimum deposit, spreads, platform choice, and overall user rating. OANDA wins on more criteria (3 categories vs 2), making it the stronger default for most traders. Both brokers remain reputable, independently tier-1 regulated options.
| FP Markets | OANDA | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.5 / 5 | ⭐ 4.6 / 5 | OANDA |
| Regulators | ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, FSA SVG | FCA, ASIC, CFTC/NFA, MAS, FSA Japan, IIROC | OANDA |
| Min. deposit | $100 | $0 (no minimum) | OANDA |
| Spreads from | 0.0 pips (Raw) | 0.6 pips (Standard) | FP Markets |
| Max. leverage | Up to 1:30 (EU retail) / 1:500 (offshore) | Up to 1:30 (EU retail) / 1:50 (US) | — |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS, FP Markets Mobile | MT4, MT5, OANDA Trade (web + mobile), TradingView | FP Markets |
| Founded | 2005 | 1996 | — |
| HQ | Sydney, Australia | Toronto, Canada / New York, USA | — |
Australian + EU traders wanting deep equity CFD coverage via IRESS plus ECN FX execution from a dual-tier-1 broker.
US-resident traders + serious EU/UK traders wanting institutional-grade regulation and a clean proprietary platform.
Based on five comparison criteria (regulation, deposit, spreads, platforms, overall rating), OANDA wins 3 categories. That makes it the stronger default choice — though both brokers remain reputable, independently tier-1 regulated options.
FP Markets holds licenses from: ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, FSA SVG. OANDA holds licenses from: FCA, ASIC, CFTC/NFA, MAS, FSA Japan, IIROC. OANDA has more regulatory licenses, giving it broader geographic coverage.
FP Markets spreads start from 0.0 pips (Raw). OANDA spreads start from 0.6 pips (Standard). Actual spreads vary by account type and market conditions.
FP Markets: $100. OANDA: $0 (no minimum). OANDA has the lower entry barrier.