Choose Interactive Brokers if you want…
Active traders, professional clients, and serious investors wanting institutional-grade execution across all asset classes.
Interactive Brokers
⭐ 4.8 / 5
VS
Tickmill
⭐ 4.5 / 5
Interactive Brokers vs Tickmill — which broker is better in 2026?
We compared Interactive Brokers and Tickmill across five core criteria: regulation, minimum deposit, spreads, platform choice, and overall user rating. Interactive Brokers wins on more criteria (4 categories vs 1), making it the stronger default for most traders. Both brokers remain reputable, independently tier-1 regulated options.
Ad · leaderboard · 728×90
| Interactive Brokers | Tickmill | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.8 / 5 | ⭐ 4.5 / 5 | Interactive Brokers |
| Regulators | SEC/FINRA, FCA, ASIC, MAS, FSA Japan, SFC HK, CySEC, BaFin | FCA, CySEC, FSA Seychelles, FSCA, Labuan FSA | Interactive Brokers |
| Min. deposit | $0 (no minimum) | $100 | Interactive Brokers |
| Spreads from | 0.1 pips + $2/lot (Pro) / IBKR Lite (commission-free US stocks) | 0.0 pips (Pro / Raw) | Tickmill |
| Max. leverage | Up to 1:30 (EU retail) / 1:50 (US) / 1:400 (Pro) | Up to 1:30 (EU retail) / 1:500 (offshore) | — |
| Platforms | Trader Workstation (TWS), IBKR Mobile, IBKR GlobalTrader, API | MT4, MT5, Tickmill Trader | Interactive Brokers |
| Founded | 1978 | 2014 | — |
| HQ | Greenwich, Connecticut, USA | London, UK / Limassol, Cyprus | — |
Pros & cons compared
Interactive Brokers pros
- ✓ Founded 1978 — listed on NASDAQ (IBKR) since 2007
- ✓ Direct regulatory presence in 12+ jurisdictions including US, UK, EU, Asia
- ✓ 1.5 million+ accounts, $400+ billion in client equity
- ✓ 150+ markets across 33 countries — broadest global access of any broker
- ✓ Real stocks, options, futures, bonds, mutual funds + FX
Cons
- ✗ Trader Workstation has a notoriously steep learning curve
- ✗ Customer service is functional but not high-touch
- ✗ Margin/financing rates are best in industry — but credit checks rigorous
Tickmill pros
- ✓ FCA + CySEC + FSCA + Labuan tier-1 + tier-2 regulators
- ✓ Pro account spreads from 0.0 pips with $2/lot commission (lowest in industry)
- ✓ Extremely scalper-friendly — no restrictions, fast execution
- ✓ Negative balance protection across all entities
- ✓ ISO 27001 certified — strong information security
Cons
- ✗ Smaller instrument catalogue (~150 vs 2,000+ at peers)
- ✗ Limited educational content
- ✗ $100 minimum deposit higher than budget brokers
Ad · in-content · 728×90
Which one should you choose?
Choose Tickmill if you want…
Cost-sensitive scalpers and high-volume traders who prioritise the lowest commissions on FX majors.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better — Interactive Brokers or Tickmill?
Based on five comparison criteria (regulation, deposit, spreads, platforms, overall rating), Interactive Brokers wins 4 categories. That makes it the stronger default choice — though both brokers remain reputable, independently tier-1 regulated options.
Is Interactive Brokers more regulated than Tickmill?
Interactive Brokers holds licenses from: SEC/FINRA, FCA, ASIC, MAS, FSA Japan, SFC HK, CySEC, BaFin. Tickmill holds licenses from: FCA, CySEC, FSA Seychelles, FSCA, Labuan FSA. Interactive Brokers has more regulatory licenses, giving it broader geographic coverage.
What are the spreads at Interactive Brokers vs Tickmill?
Interactive Brokers spreads start from 0.1 pips + $2/lot (Pro) / IBKR Lite (commission-free US stocks). Tickmill spreads start from 0.0 pips (Pro / Raw). Actual spreads vary by account type and market conditions.
Which has a lower minimum deposit, Interactive Brokers or Tickmill?
Interactive Brokers: $0 (no minimum). Tickmill: $100. Interactive Brokers has the lower entry barrier.